I support the notion of a level playing field in virtually everything. I say "virtually" only to cover my butt in case there is a situation I have yet to experience where it wouldn't make sense. But, I'm hard pressed to imagine such a situation.
Unfortunately "fair" is increasingly seeping into community conversations regarding contracts for Destination Marketing. Visit Duluth is in the midst of an RFP process with their City...and news out of Juneau AK indicates that its DMO will be facing a similar gauntlet.
Don't get me wrong...Cities have every right and responsibility to demand accountability for the revenues they invest in any endeavor. Unfortunately, those that go down this path haven't considered that their DMO is a classic example of a "Sole Source Provider." There are simply no other entities that provide the breadth of services that a local DMO does and can. Saying that we must be "fair" and let competitors state their case is flimsy, at best.
If it's an ad agency, they might have cooler creative...but they don't have a running relationship with a database of thousands of meetings and event planners across the country. If it's a Chamber of Commerce, they might have good relations with the region's business community...but they won't represent those cool businesses that make a destination magnetic if those businesses aren't members. And handing DMO responsibilities to a Convention Center that may have a database but no expertise in brand and social media? There are more examples of where it doesn't work than where it does.
It's called a Sole Source Provider for a reason.
And, let's not even go to engaging a vendor from out of town. This past year has shown how vital boots on the ground are. Would a vendor from Wichita have worked 70 hours a week to help save businesses in Duluth during the pandemic? Doubtful.
Again...I get that this might seem like a lot of money for Cities to invest (it's really not when one understands the true impact of Destination Marketing in Economic Development and Quality of Place) without a competitive process. But, when DMOs are the only entities with the experience, database and dedication to successfully (and singularly) market a community...these are RFPs that should have a pre-determined outcome.
Unless it's political...or about price. But, consider this...would a City contract with a road construction company that doesn't have graders and pavers just because of price?
Then why consider such a move with your DMO...if it isn't price or politics?
Appreciate the instructive link regarding the definitions of a "Sole Source" provider and a "Single Source" provider.
Posted by: Lee T | June 11, 2021 at 12:05